Reality Holes. Undesigning the 20th Century in Eastern Estonia

Main Article Content

Francisco Martínez

Abstract

Through the study of mining holes that have appeared in Kohtla-Järve, this article shows how repair work can take on a political charge by re-ordering the social and materializing different dimensions of care. In this regard, the investigation of situated forms of material failure leads us to reconsider who has, or should have, the responsibility to fix what is broken, and how repair is linked to questions of future-making and care. The conclusion points, first, to the fact that repairing entails facing the harmful consequences of past design decisions, long after; second, that, when projecting post-extractivist futures, we must confront the need to undo the pernicious elements of modernity; and third, that critiques about the social and ecological cost of infrastructural failure must include the perspectives of local population.


ARTICLE ONLY AVAILABLE IN SPANISH


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Martínez, F. (2023). Reality Holes. Undesigning the 20th Century in Eastern Estonia. Diseña, (23), Article.4. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.23.Article.4
Section
Original Articles (part 1)
Author Biography

Francisco Martínez, Tampere University

Ph.D. in Anthropology, Tallinn University. After graduating as a Journalist from Madrid Complutense Univer­sity, he obtained a master’s degree in International Development and Cooperation from Lisbon School of Economics and Mana­gement. Currently, he is a researcher in the ERC WasteMatters group at Tampere University and convenor of the Collaboratory for Ethnographic Experimentation (EASA Network). His most recent books include Ethnographic Experiments with Artists, Designers and Boundary Objects (UCL Press, 2021) and Remains of the Soviet Past in Estonia (UCL Press, 2018). He has also co-edited Repair, Broken­ness, Breakthrough (with P. Laviolette; Berghahn, 2019). In 2018 he received the young scholar award of the European Association of Social Anthropologists. He has also curated several exhibitions.

References

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press.

Callén, B., & Criado, T. S. (2015). Vulnerability Tests. Matters of “Care for Matter” in E-waste Practices. Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 6(2), Article 2.

Carroll, T., Jeevendrampillai, D., Parkhurst, A., & Shackelford, J. (Eds.). (2017). The Material Culture of Failure: When Things Do Wrong. Bloomsbury.

Denis, J., & Pontille, D. (2014). Maintenance Work and the Performativity of Urban Inscriptions: The Case of Paris Subway Signs. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(3), 404-416. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13007p

Denis, J., & Pontille, D. (2015). Material Ordering and the Care of Things. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(3), 338-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914553129

Dzenovska, D. (2018). Emptiness and its Futures: Staying and Leaving as Tactics of Life in Latvia. Focaal, 2018(80), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2018.800102

Dzenovska, D. (2020). Emptiness. Capitalism Without People in the Latvian Countryside. American Ethnologist, 47(1), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12867

Graham, S., & Thrift, N. (2007). Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075954

Henke, C. R., & Sims, B. (2020). Repairing Infrastructures: The Maintenance of Materiality and Power. MIT Press.

Jackson, S. J. (2014). Rethinking Repair. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (pp. 221-239). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0015

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.

Marres, N. (2012). Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Palgrave Macmillan.

Martínez, F. (2019a). Insiders’ Manual to Breakdown. In F. Martínez & P. Laviolette (Eds.), Repair, Brokenness, Breakthrough: Ethnographic Responses (pp. 1-16). Berghahn.

Martínez, F. (2019b). What Is in a Hole? Voids out of Place and Politics below the State in Georgia. In F. Martínez & P. Laviolette (Eds.), Repair, Brokenness, Breakthrough: Ethnographic Responses (pp. 121-144). Berghahn.

Martínez, F. (2020). Politics of Recuperation: Repair and Recovery in Post-crisis Portugal. Bloomsbury.

Martínez, F. (2023). From Repair to Post-brokenness: Horizontal Materialisations in Estonia and Portugal. Etnográfica (in press).

Martínez, F., & Agu, M. (2021). Postcards from the Edge: Territorial Sacrifice and Care in Eastern Estonia. Roadsides, 5. https://doi.org/10.26034/roadsides-202100510

Martínez, F., & Laviolette, P. (Eds.). (2019). Repair, Brokenness, Breakthrough: Ethnographic Responses. Berghahn.

Mol, A. (2008). The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge.

Tironi, M., & Rodríguez Giralt, I. (2017). Healing, Knowing, Enduring: Care and Politics in Damaged Worlds. The Sociological Review Monographs, 65(2), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917712874

Tronto, J. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Routledge.

Ureta, S. (2014). Normalizing Transantiago: On the Challenges (and Limits) of Repairing Infrastructures. Social Studies of Science, 44(3), 368-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714523855