Hesitating between Threads and Needles: An Inquiry into the Dimension of Touch in Design Experimentation

Main Article Content

Ana Maria Copetti Maccagnan
Guilherme Englert Corrêa Meyer

Abstract

Even though experimentation and its material aspect are linked to the practice of design, few texts approach the concept intertwined with a dimension of touch. Considering the uncertain and critical times in which we perceive ourselves as a society, we need practices different from those prevalent in interaction design fields, yet capable of touching other possible worlds. We trust that the act of slowing down enables us to cultivate a distinct sensitivity, hesitating in the construction of a ‘good common world’. This article investigates spaces of hesitation through touch-oriented experimentation and reports on one case of an experimental practice developed from the formation of an embroidery collective. The practice proposes a design performance more engaged with uncertainties, care, and subjectivities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Copetti Maccagnan, A. M., & Meyer, G. E. C. (2022). Hesitating between Threads and Needles: An Inquiry into the Dimension of Touch in Design Experimentation. Diseña, (20), Article.5. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.20.Article.5 (Original work published January 31, 2022)
Section
Original Articles (part 1)
Author Biographies

Ana Maria Copetti Maccagnan, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Department of Design

BA and MA in Strategic Design, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Strategic designer and researcher. Her research addresses experimental practices and their material aspects regarding touch and care. She is co-author of ‘Relatos de práticas e a formação de um coletivo de experi­mentação em design estratégico’ (with G. E. C. Meyer, B. A. Lorenz, D. B. Gloeden, M. V. Batista, M. M. Lesnovski, and N. D. Figueiredo; in Proceedings of the III Design Culture Symposium: Scenarios, Speculation & Strategies). She has been acknowled­ged as Academic of the year (2018) by the Bornancini Award.

Guilherme Englert Corrêa Meyer, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Department of Design

BA in Graphic and Product Design, Santa Catarina State University. MA in Regional Develop­ment, Regional University of Blumenau. Ph.D. in Design, Pontifi­cal Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro. Designer, educator, and researcher, he is associated with the Post Graduate Program in Design at Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. He is also visi­ting professor at the Product Design MA program at the Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador. Former visiting scholar at Georgia Tech. He has a background in Design, Anthropology, and Science and Technology Studies. His research includes thinking design in the Anthropocene and experimental practices of prototyping. Some of his latest publications include: ‘Vivendo no Antropo­ceno: o Design e a Arte lidando com os modos de uma Época Impossível’ (Estudos em Design, Vol. 28, Issue 2), and ‘Aprendi­zaje como prototipado: experimentación en la educación infantil’ (with C. Navarro; Inmaterial. Diseño, Arte y Sociedad, Vol. 5).

References

Bentz, I. (2014). Processo de projeto: Do ponto de vista aos efeitos de sentidos. 11 Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Em Design, Blucher Design Proceedings, 1(4), 570–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.5151/designpro-ped-01254

Binder, T., Brandt, E., Ehn, P., & Halse, J. (2015). Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory. CoDesign, 11(3–4), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248

Brandt, E., Eriksen, M. A., Binder, T., & Redström, J. (2015). The Perform Codesign Experiment – On What People Actually Do and the Relation Between Program and Experiment in Research Through Design. IASDR 2015 Interplay: Proceedings Publication, 234–249. http://iasdr2015.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IASDR_Proceedings_Final.pdf

Chen, X., Shao, F., Barnes, C., Childs, T., & Henson, B. (2009). Exploring Relationships between Touch Perception and Surface Physical Properties. International Journal of Design, 3(2), 67–76.

de Assis, P. (2015). Introduction. In P. de Assis (Ed.), Experimental Affinities in Music (pp. 7–14). Leuven University Press.

Diergarten, F. (2015). Omnis ars ex experimentis dependeat: “Experiments” in Fourteenth-Century Musical Thought. In P. de Assis (Ed.), Experimental Affinities in Music (pp. 42–63). Leuven University Press.

DiSalvo, C. (2014). Critical Making as Materializing the Politics of Design. The Information Society, 30(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.875770

Goehr, L. (2015). Explosive Experiments and the Fragility of the Experimental. In P. de Assis (Ed.), Experimental Affinities in Music (pp. 15–41). Leuven University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (1995). Saberes localizados: A questão da ciência para o feminismo e o privilégio da perspectiva parcial. Cadernos Pagu, 5, 7–41.

Haraway, D. J. (2008). When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press.

Höök, K. (2018). Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. MIT Press.

Höök, K., Ståhl, A., Jonsson, M., Mercurio, J., Karlsson, A., & Johnson, E.-C. B. (2015). Somaesthetic Design. Interactions, 22(4), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2770888

Ingold, T. (2012). Trazendo as coisas de volta à vida: Emaranhados criativos num mundo de materiais. Horizontes Antropológicos, 18(37), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-71832012000100002

Ingold, T. (2013a). Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2013b). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2021). Correspondences. Polity.

Le Guin, U. K. (2019). The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction. Ignota Books.

Lindström, K., & Ståhl, Å. (2017). Politics of Inviting: Co-Articulations of Issues in Designerly Public Engagement. Diseña, (11), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.11.110-121

Meyer, G. E. C. (2018). A experimentação como espaço ambivalente de antecipação e proposição de controvérsias. Estudos em Design, 26(1), 29–47.

Meyer, G. E. C. (2019). Strategic Design, Cosmopolitics and Obscure Situations. Strategic Design Research Journal, 12(3), 417–432.

Pallasmaa, J. (2009). Os olhos da pele: A arquitetura e os sentidos. Artmed.

Patarroyo, J., Cortés-Rico, L., Sánchez-Aldana, E., Pérez-Bustos, T., & Rincón, N. (2019). Testimonial Digital Textiles: Material metaphors to think with care about reconciliation with four memory sewing circles in Colombia. Proceedings of the 8th Bi-Annual Nordic Design Research Society Conference - Who Cares?, Article 8.

Pérez-Bustos, T., Tobar-Roa, V., & Márquez-Gutiérrez, S. (2016). Etnografías de los contactos. Reflexiones feministas sobre el bordado como conocimiento. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, 26. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda26.2016.02

Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

Pye, D. (1968). The Nature and Art of Workmanship. Cambridge University Press.

Ratto, M. (2011). Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information Society, 27(4), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819

Rose, H. (1983). Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 9(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/494025

Shercliff, E., & Twigger Holroyd, A. (2016). Making With Others: Working with textile craft groups as a means of research. Studies in Material Thinking, 14, Article 07.

Stengers, I. (2018). A proposição cosmopolítica. Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros, 69, 442–464. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-901X.v0i69p442-464

Tsing, A. L. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. ‎ Princeton University Press.